Un-prehensile and loving it
March 29th, 2008The Housemate, intent, as usual, on sullying my reputation, has posted the image above on her Flickr page, along with the caption: “Delphine yearns to be prehensile“.
Something tells me that the Housemate, sloppy grammarian that she is, meant in fact to say that I yearn for my paws to be prehensile, as, according to definition number 2 of the dictionary entry for the term pictured below, I could be the poster pup for prehensility, thank you very much.
Regardless of her meaning, I should like to state publicly, for the benefit of my Housemate and the other unfortunate people who read her blog, take her silly polls and view the poorly composed images on her Flickr page, that I harbour no desire, secret or otherwise, to have paws that function any way other than the way mine do at present.
It is indeed unfortunate that there are in fact members of my species (known in the community as “donkeys”*) who have such desires, and even some who refuse to seek treatment for the condition, claiming they enjoy a higher quality of life as a result (more efficient grooming and the ability to grasp chicken drumsticks more firmly are two of the more commonly cited examples). Nor am I one to dispute the usefulness of a a prehensile paw in the case of arthritic male dogs who are no longer able to raise their legs to urinate without physical assistance.
But to state that I am a member of this reviled minority is the biggest lie since the accountant at the Emperors Club assured Eliot Spitzer that paying by cash would make his activities untraceable.
*donkey=dog + monkey











